Re: 20th Century art -- 2001-2002 Cultural Literacy Class Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:23:14 05/02/02 Thu
Author: Christine Millar
Subject:

Re: 20th Century art
In reply to: LR 's message, "Re: 20th Century art" on 04:27:43 05/02/02 Thu

Although Mondrian is a respected artist, his work lacks the same quality as many other talented artists. Many of his works were in reality pictures of New York City (from a bird's eye) and can be seen as very dramatic. However, that is my opinion and I would like to believe that I am entitled to it. In plain English. I do not like his work. I can seen nothing "deep" and meaningful to a bunch of lines thrown onto a canvas. Saying Mondrian's work is art is like calling plaid art. Not all designs require an immense amount of thinking. Those that do, I can appreciate as art.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]