VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:42 25/04/24 Thu
Author: VVBD
Author Host/IP: NoHost / 1.145.136.243
Subject: We should then be playing Ed Allan on the inside
In reply to: Rodda83 's message, "Fin is not an inside mid like T.Adams or L.Ball. Honestly can't believe they let Tadams go." on 22:19 25/04/24 Thu

this kid is built for the modern game, and as a relatively high draft pick, he now needs a rocket up his backside to get some grunt and urgency into his play or else his career will be over before it commenced.

His stats to date at seconds level would suggest that his career has regressed this season so far after he was knocking on the door a number of times last year.

We should play him in the guts, tell him to get his hands dirty, and drill into him that his form will be rewarded should he apply himself.

However, I also feel that Fin and Reef should be played as clearance mids and when form warrants they must be played in their proper midfield positions at senior level. We are hindering their development by not giving them proper senior minutes in their true positions.

Macrae is 1.88mt, so he's not undersized. He just needs to be backed when his opportunity arises. Similarly 1.94mt Reef, who has the size to be dominant mid if allowed to develop.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Forum timezone: GMT+9
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.