VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:42 17/05/24 Fri
Author: muddy
Author Host/IP: 180-150-51-173.b49633.mel.static.aussiebb.net / 180.150.51.173
Subject: Who excused it?
In reply to: Porter 's message, "Putting things in people's mouths." on 10:07 17/05/24 Fri

I haven't read that anyone thinks that Schultz shouldn't have received a week.

You want to take on the "world" based on your assertion that "it was a shit and weak act."

I don't think it was a shit and weak act; I suggest that most ppl here don't either.

He deserved a week's suspension because players should not and cannot strike each other.

Based on your argument, if he, as it has been said, got elbowed in the throat, it was not a shit and weak act because he saw it coming. Hence, throwing acid in someone's face is not a shit and weak act either because one is front-on to the victim.

Schultz was angry because he did not expect (see) an elbow to the throat coming. He retaliated, which is against the rules.

I said that Schultz's opponent might have "deserved a clip" in a semantic rather than literal sense. This is evident in my summary that he "deserved a week."

By depicting Schultz as a coward and thug and then selectively carving up the ensuing discourse on this Board to misrepresent and characterise other EB & Whiters, you are pontificating over this discussion as if you were the only person with a moral position.

No matter how well you want to serve yourself, Schultz has not shown that he is a thug, and the posters on this Board are not exhibiting moral turpitude.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
 * HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

* Name (required):

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+9
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.