VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:16 30/06/24 Sun
Author: Colin Wisbey
Author Host/IP: n175-39-135-218.meb4.vic.optusnet.com.au / 175.39.135.218
Subject: We're not talking about backline generally tho but Moore's specific contribution
In reply to: Tim 's message, "Exactly. The main problem starts in the middle people" on 12:28 30/06/24 Sun

No backline has been more under siege in last couple/few yrs than WCE yet McGovern and Barrass usually stand up.

Among the better performed teams of recent years, Andrews' form held up this year when Brisbane overall was playing like a bottom 6 (or 8) team.

Or Weitering consistently performing well when Blues were poor year after year.

Tom Stewart, like Moore, plays an attacking game for a marking KD. Admittedly Geelong have been a strong team during most of his career but he's rarely not performed to his normal capability even when Geelong has had poor games.

Maybe Moore is carrying an injury, or at least soreness. I'm just saying his form - regardless of circumstances - this year hasn't, overall, been what we (are entitled to) expect from him, even allowing for the very telling absence of Murphy.

IMHO, Quaynor's form has been OK but below his norm. He's come under scrutiny for it from some quarters. I just reckon Darcy has largely escaped scrutiny.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
 * HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

* Name (required):

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+9
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.