For more context to my answer... -- BULLET IN BOARD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:03 17/10/24 Thu
Author: Cakewalk
Author Host/IP: 203-221-160-55.tpgi.com.au / 203.221.160.55
Subject: For more context to my answer...
In reply to: the seer 's message, "Appreciate the answers! Funnily, they differ wildly. But the dates link from Stillwaters looks useful.." on 09:54 17/10/24 Thu

We finalise the list spots today. Players like McInnes, Sullivan, Long, etc. find out if they get a new contract or are to be rookie listed.

And will therefore know how many spots we have left to fill with DFA.

Then it's a matter of actually filling them.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Yeah. To move guys to rookie list they need to be delisted first don't they? (NT) -- Tim, 10:05 17/10/24 Thu

Forum timezone: GMT+9
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.