Query.... -- Quandry Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:16:38 01/29/02 Tue
Author: Sandstorm's player
Subject: Query....

I'm just wondering, but there's a player called Amber who got mad at me, and now they're setting all their characters against me. That would be fine, except there is like 100 of them. One of the horses challenged Sandstorm, for his entire HERD, and the horse had never even spoken to him! I don't think this is really fair (the horse was named "Spainard"). First of all, I could have lost my entire herd because one player got mad at me over one small little thing. Go and read the message if you want, it's at the Highlands, and it's down a fair way.
I was wondering, perhaps, if the rules should be changed... It's fine to challenge for a particular horse, but for a whole herd? That would be my five mares... If the horse Spainard had perhaps come to the highlands, seen one mare they wanted, then yeah, ok, but the horse hadn't even been to the highlands, and the entire HERD?
Anyway, it's up to Seqiro, but I think you should think about it.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

but ive ben watching u 2 and she mad a good point 2 -- observant, 18:36:10 01/31/02 Thu