| Subject: Free Change |
Author:
Dio
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 23:35:51 04/18/06 Tue
The ultimate coaching tool?
Position one: You know how it goes. Kerry says I can't do that.
Position two: You know she can. So you tell her.
Equals outcome:
And end up in an argument in which her self-limiting belief is strengthened by your well-intentioned comments.
When you recognise that a person has a belief that gets in the way of their success or happiness it is very tempting to want to tell them of the error of their ways. After all, once you point out to them how stupid they are being they will thank you and change their ways, right?
If only
Alas, Were it only so!
Obviously not!
A perceived attack: None of us likes being told that we are wrong and that the speaker is right. So we energetically defend our beliefs, even the daft ones. In fact, the strength with which we adhere to our beliefs reflects the degree to which we have had to defend them!
Seeing this in others is the easy part!
Seeing it in ourselves
and acting on the insight
Not so easy!
Equals a No Win: The more you argue with a person and tell them how wrong they are the more you strengthen the belief that you wish to loosen.
Next step: What to do? Use two tools: questions and the Meta Model. Plus huge amounts of rapport, good observational skills, the ability to be quiet while the other person thinks things through, and patience (because strong self-limiting beliefs respond best to a very gradual softly, softly approach rather than a full frontal attack backed by the force of your personality.
Speaking as one who defends the above position (position two) It is a now ingrained reaction that exasperates achieving harmonious outcomes.
After this state break follows an introduction to an alternative
..
What is the Meta Model?
The Meta Model is, in my opinion, the most valuable of the NLP skills. (Ask on the forum) It provides us with a means of identifying when a person is using one of the thirteen key forms of sloppy thinking.
It also provides a means of subtly coaching a person (so long as they agree) in better ways of thinking
-thus reducing misunderstandings by making our own communication more clear and unambiguous.
For example
Let's say, for example, that Jack says 'I can tell Jill doesn't like me from her expression so there is no point in asking her for a date! That makes me sad because I never have any luck with girls.'
At first glance/hearing a fairly understandable comment. Yet when we apply the Meta Model to it we learn a little more
§ Jack believes he can read Jill's mind. This is an erroneous belief unless he is a very gifted clairvoyant.
§ He also believes that the appearance of her facial muscles enables him to predict what her likely response will be. In reality he is looking at her expression and deciding that if he had the same expression he would be feeling certain feelings and would also be likely to react in a particular way
and, as a result of this piece of questionable deduction, that he can predict her behaviour.
§ He has a very limiting belief that he never has any 'luck with girls'. This is a generalisation - a belief which rests on skimpy and carefully selected evidence. While it is possible that it is true this is rather unlikely. What is more likely is that he has is using the memory of a number of set-backs to generalise the past, to predict that the future will simply be more of the same - and to trap himself in a prison of his own un-useful beliefs.
§ In saying that 'this makes me sad' Jack is announcing that he believes that his emotions are the result of outside events over which he has no control. But the way in which he announces this ensures that be remains a victim - since his comment implies no ownership of the difficulty! He 'is' a victim. But a victim of his thinking style rather than of events.
To assist Jack we could use the Meta Model to alert him to how his predicament is resulting from his own less-than-useful thinking. And, rather than lecture him on the error of his ways, we can do this in the most subtle manner - by simply asking a seemingly innocuous question or two!
The idea is for Jack to challenge his assumptions rather that go down the rabbit hole of Right/Wrong
(The following can be considered as bait. The Idea being
Show me the $$$!)
How to learn the Meta Model
Like all NLP skills the Meta Model is easiest to learn when you do it interactively at a workshop. And you will get best results when you seamlessly integrate it with other NLP skills and principles such as rapport, respect for the other person's right to their own views, the ability to recognise and respond to non-verbal communication, and awareness of naturally occurring anchors.
And, yes, you can develop skill with the Meta Model through books especially if you go about it in a very systematic and thorough manner. The following are some pointers:
1 Have two or three books on the go simultaneously so you benefit from the different viewpoints and emphases of the authors.
2 Take one category at a time and practise it for a week or two.
3 Listen for the category only during the first couple of minutes of the conversation - otherwise you are unlikely to take a very active role on the conversation!
4 The Meta Model 'challenges' or coaching questions need to be used with great caution. Avoid using them at all until you have reached the stage where you are able to recognise all thirteen categories. Then only use the challenges when you have very good rapport and calibration skills.
5 Be careful to avoid overusing the coaching questions - otherwise the Meta Model can become an interrogation tool.
6 It is often a good idea to announce in advance that you will be asking a number helpful coaching questions to alert you to how certain thinking patterns may be getting in your way.
Coaching & the Meta Model
Whether in formal or informal settings most coaching tends to rest on an uneasy blend of traditional Rogerian counselling methods and advice-giving. The Meta Model provides a means of making coaching more empowering, more respectful, more comfortable - and considerably more effective.
Instead of trying to provide answers the 'coach' uses questions to literally coach the other person in finding their own answers. Instead of enduring an uncomfortable, blame-oriented, and occasionally demeaning, session the person being coached experiences a sense of empowerment - they've found their own answers.
Is it worth the effort?
The Meta Model isn't as sexy or dramatic as anchoring or the submodality techniques or the eye accessing cues. Yet, once learned, it is likely to be the skill that you will use most consistently - in every single conversation.
It also enables you to think and communicate with a precision and clarity that is far from common
From our free The Pegasus NLP Newsletter - 20 May 2002. If you would like to receive the newsletter every few weeks you can subscribe at the bottom of main Newsletter Page)
© 2002-2006 Reg Connolly - but you can freely pass this newsletter on to friends as long as you do so in its entirety, include this message and link: http://www.nlp-now.co.uk. Please contact us if you would like to reproduce this article in your own newsletter.
Or, address your pertinent to the above topic questions to me. I know the process and will share !
And if it doesnt work I will cheerfully return what you paid in money
Diogenes
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 