Which translates into more than a 60% improvement SINCE dems "whupped" pugs in last election -- environmental discussion

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Which translates into more than a 60% improvement SINCE dems "whupped" pugs in last election

Author:
Mo' Green
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 09:07:43 04/12/07 Thu
In reply to: Oropan 's message, "Bottom line...only 40% approve!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" on 05:27:35 04/12/07 Thu

Numbers in isolation mean nothing. You have to put them in perspective.

>>You're clueless as usual.
>>
>> >>href="http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm">http:/
>/
>>www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
>>
>>NBC/Wall Street Journal RV
>> 9/8-11/06 20 approval 65 disaproval
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>I guess that means 60% disapprove. That ain't gone
>>to
>>>>>win ya too many elections.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Why does he get everything arse backwards?
>>>>>>Well, we all know he's a worthless prognosticator;
>>>>>> >>>>>>href="http://www.voy.com/60108/19835.html">http://
>w
>>w
>>>w
>>>>.
>>>>>v
>>>>>>oy.com/60108/19835.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/334145
>,
>>C
>>>S
>>>>T
>>>>>-
>>>>>>NWS-cong10.article">http://www.suntimes.com/news/p
>o
>>l
>>>i
>>>>t
>>>>>i
>>>>>>cs/334145,CST-NWS-cong10.article
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Congress enjoys something new -- public approval
>>>>>>
>>>>>>April 10, 2007
>>>>>>Public approval for Congress is at its highest
>>level
>>>>>>in a year as Democrats mark 100 days in power and
>>>>step
>>>>>>up their confrontation with President Bush over
>his
>>>>>>handling of the Iraq war, the issue that
>>overshadows
>>>>>>all others.
>>>>>>Overall approval for Congress is 40 percent. The
>>>>>>survey shows Bush's approval ratings remain in the
>>>>>>mid-30 percent range.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>''The Democrats are back,'' Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the
>>>>>>first woman speaker in history, had exulted on
>Jan.
>>>3
>>>>>>as her party claimed control for the first time in
>>>>>>more than a decade.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>While Iraq has dominated since then, Democrats
>also
>>>>>>quickly showcased their domestic priorities and
>>used
>>>>>>their power to convene hearings to embarrass the
>>>>>>administration. AP

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

OK, anyway you want to spin it is fine with me. BTW, Oropan 10:06:38 04/12/07 Thu

Spin? I put the number in context. You attempted to isloate it to understate its significance. -- Mo' Green, 10:45:13 04/12/07 Thu

Re: Spin? I put the number in context. You attempted to isloate it to understate its significance. -- Oropan, 11:00:34 04/12/07 Thu

Oh, BTW... -- Oropan, 11:03:07 04/12/07 Thu

Subject	Author	Date
OK, anyway you want to spin it is fine with me. BTW,	Oropan	10:06:38 04/12/07 Thu
Spin? I put the number in context. You attempted to isloate it to understate its significance. -- Mo' Green, 10:45:13 04/12/07 Thu Re: Spin? I put the number in context. You attempted to isloate it to understate its significance. -- Oropan, 11:00:34 04/12/07 Thu Oh, BTW... -- Oropan, 11:03:07 04/12/07 Thu