The guy was out voted 10 to 1. That means he's won according to Oro -- environmental discussion

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

Subject: The guy was out voted 10 to 1. That means he's won according to Oro

Author:
Mo' Green
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 16:33:22 04/09/07 Mon
In reply to: Bev 's message, "Thats one persons opinion. He was one member of the 11 from the NAS" on 12:57:50 04/09/07 Mon

Nevermind that the count of peer reveiwed studies is 928 to ZERO against Oropan's postion. He's here to set us straight. Don't you know, Bev?

>Looks as if the MAJORITY Of the scientists who sat on
>this panel did not agree with him
>
> >href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lindzen">htt
>p://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lindzen
>
>National Academy of Sciences Climate Change Science
>report
>
>[edit] Lindzen's role in preparing the report
>Lindzen served on an 11-member panel organized by the
>National Academy of Sciences.[8] The panel's report,
>titled Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key
>Questions,[9] has been widely cited.
>
>The first paragraph of the summary states,
>
>Greenhouse gases are accumulating in Earth's
>atmosphere as a result of human activities, causing
>surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean
>temperatures to rise. Temperatures are, in fact,
>rising. The changes observed over the last several
>decades are likely mostly due to human activities, but
>we cannot rule out that some significant part of these
>changes is also a reflection of natural variability.[10

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

"but we cannot rule out that some significant part of these changes is also a reflection of natural variability." Oropan 05:25:07 04/10/07 Tue

No you are not open minded you say absolutely that global warming is not man made Bev 10:07:31 04/10/07 Tue

Re: No you are not open minded you say absolutely that global warming is not man made -- Oropan, 11:05:07 04/10/07 Tue

Subject	Author	Date
"but we cannot rule out that some significant part of these changes is also a reflection of natural variability."	Oropan	05:25:07 04/10/07 Tue

No you are not open minded you say absolutely that global warming is not man made	Bev	10:07:31 04/10/07 Tue
Re: No you are not open minded you say absolutely that global warming is not man made -- Oropan, 11:05:07 04/10/07 Tue