Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9], 10 ] |
| Subject: If its illegal then anne coulter should be in prison for saying all dems should be killed etc. nt | |
|
Author: Bev |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 14:18:49 03/12/07 Mon In reply to: jw 's message, "Re: Forget the police!" on 10:52:22 03/12/07 Mon > and who is supposed to catch them? when someone >sends me a death threat, i first call the cops. Btw, >it is illegal to send death threats, refering to GW >deniers in the same light as Holocaust deniers is >legal, whether it is logical or good for the debate is >another issue. Usually we tend to refer to global >warming deniers as being similar to the flat earth >society, except that the flat earthers never >controlled our society like GW deniers do! > > Also, there is a difference between a scientist >denying GW and a business crook or a politician >denying GW. We need scientists to deny or critique >current GW theory, just as the manhattan project had a >group of scientists working to prove that an atomic >bomb could not be built, we need to think outside the >box. while i highly dought anyone will disprove man's >role in GW, or that it is catastrophic, the critisism >will likely expose faults in our current understanding >of GW. Science is about constantly challenging held >positions, science is not faith. the business crook >denies GW purely for profit, that has nothing to do >with seeking the truth. > >>Sue the bastards! >> >> >> >> >>> >>>>Scientists threatened for 'climate denial' >>>>By Tom Harper, Sunday Telegraph >>>>Last Updated: 12:24am GMT 11/03/2007 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Scientists who questioned mankind's impact on >climate >>>>change have received death threats and claim to have >>>>been shunned by the scientific community. >>>> >>>>They say the debate on global warming has been >>>>"hijacked" by a powerful alliance of politicians, >>>>scientists and environmentalists who have stifled >all >>>>questioning about the true environmental impact of >>>>carbon dioxide emissions. >>>> >>>>Timothy Ball, a former climatology professor at the >>>>University of Winnipeg in Canada, has received five >>>>deaths threats by email since raising concerns about >>>>the degree to which man was affecting climate >change. >>>> >>>>One of the emails warned that, if he continued to >>>>speak out, he would not live to see further global >>>>warming. >>>> >>>>"Western governments have pumped billions of dollars >>>>into careers and institutes and they feel >>threatened," >>>>said the professor. >>>> >>>>"I can tolerate being called a sceptic because all >>>>scientists should be sceptics, but then they started >>>>calling us deniers, with all the connotations of the >>>>Holocaust. That is an obscenity. It has got really >>>>nasty and personal." >>>> >>>>Last week, Professor Ball appeared in The Great >>Global >>>>Warming Swindle, a Channel 4 documentary in which >>>>several scientists claimed the theory of man-made >>>>global warming had become a "religion", forcing >>>>alternative explanations to be ignored. >>>> >>>>Richard Lindzen, the professor of Atmospheric >Science >>>>at Massachusetts Institute of Technology - who also >>>>appeared on the documentary - recently claimed: >>>>"Scientists who dissent from the alarmism have seen >>>>their funds disappear, their work derided, and >>>>themselves labelled as industry stooges. >>>> >>>>"Consequently, lies about climate change gain >>credence >>>>even when they fly in the face of the science." >>>> >>>>Dr Myles Allen, from Oxford University, agreed. He >>>>said: "The Green movement has hijacked the issue of >>>>climate change. It is ludicrous to suggest the only >>>>way to deal with the problem is to start micro >>>>managing everyone, which is what environmentalists >>>>seem to want to do." >>>> >>>>Nigel Calder, a former editor of New Scientist, >said: >>>>"Governments are trying to achieve unanimity by >>>>stifling any scientist who disagrees. Einstein could >>>>not have got funding under the present system." [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |