Date Posted:08:40:02 05/28/04 Fri Author: ubfww Subject: Re: ubfww In reply to:
Chris
's message, "Re: ubfww" on 08:29:39 05/28/04 Fri
It is an interesting thing about the code of discipline question, because the answer for "yes" required that it be explained at the end which it wasn't.
Also, she puts Lee's salary at 30K, which was not at all a princely sum in 1991. At the same time, it says no ministry funds are for personal use...is this contradictory, or did Lee really live on 30k?
Also, it says that no family members or blood relatives are officers together...however, I thought Lee's wife handles the offerings?
Also, why did Sarah B. lie and say that the questions were anonymous?
I think UBF in the conflict with the truth, UBF people are slipping farther and farther into unreality and magical thinking....
