Re: How Can Paul Hong Say This With a Straight Face? -- RSQUBF discussion forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:44:39 06/03/04 Thu
Author: Joe
Subject: Re: How Can Paul Hong Say This With a Straight Face?
In reply to: Brian K 's message, "Re: How Can Paul Hong Say This With a Straight Face?" on 15:47:06 06/02/04 Wed

Okay, I wasn't so much focused on the fact that the news got published on Rick Ross' cultnews.com site. Let me restate: Is UBF's negative reputation over the years and the recent NAE decision the result of a "vast anti-UBF conspiracy?"

I guess my point is this (and I know I need to be clearer in my writing): If the people who have spoken up about UBF in the past and present (and future) are just a bunch of "conspiracy nuts," then it seems that they are very believable "conspiracy nuts," with whom respected cult experts like Rick Ross, the media, mainstream clergy and even the NAE seem to agree.

>Read the cultnews disclaimer:
>
>This news page is about groups, organizations or
>movements, which may have been "cults" and/or
>"cult-like" in some way, shape or form. But not all
>groups called either "cults" or "cult-like" are
>harmful. Instead, they may be benign and generally
>defined as simply people intensely devoted to a
>person, place or thing. Therefore, the discussion or
>mention of a group, organization or person on this
>page, is not necessarily meant pejoratively.
>
>>And is rel=nofollow target=_blank >>href=http://rsqubf.fortunecity.net/documents/external/
>e
>>xternal.html>this or rel=nofollow target=_blank >>href=http://www.cultnews.com/archives/000746.html>this
><
>>a/> the result of a vast anti-UBF "conspiracy?"

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: New Subject -- BrianK, 13:23:38 06/03/04 Thu
- Re: New Subject -- Joe, 13:51:21 06/03/04 Thu
  - Re: New Subject -- Joe, 15:10:20 06/04/04 Fri
- Warning to Brian -- admin, 15:56:11 06/03/04 Thu
Re: How Can Paul Hong Say This With a Straight Face? -- former, 08:14:06 06/04/04 Fri