Re: The So-called "Confucius" -- RSQUBF discussion forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 02:10:38 02/05/05 Sat
Author: ts
Subject:

Re: The So-called "Confucius"
In reply to: ex-HKUBFer 's message, "The So-called "Confucius"" on 21:50:31 02/04/05 Fri

I am totally confused about confucious.Did the word confusion originate from the word confucious, by any chance? Sorry off topic, Appreciate your views here or preferably in the offtopic forum .
Cheers!
>Being a human living in the East Asia, I can say, this
>kind of tyranny is totally different from the idea of
>Confucius. I can say, it is the hypocracy of the
>church leaders rather than the teachings and ideas of
>Confucius.
>
>For Confucius, I dun like him, yet I think he had some
>contribution to the culture, but unfortunately always
>being misused by the authority in the history. These
>authorities actually were not following the teachings
>of Confucius, but on the malicious idea of themselves.
>
>Frankly speaking, again, I dun like Confucius, but I
>also dun like this old man to be misinterpreted indeed.
>
>If anyone is angered by my feelings, here I apologise
>for this.
>
>P.S.: In the ancient China, at the time of Confucius,
>it was quite surprising that the people actually could
>date. I am really confused that why things could go in
>a strange way that the people were going to the way to
>be restricted. Alas! Alas! May God's Truth be with the
>people.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]