Re: Not you -- RSQUBF discussion forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 02:26:40 02/05/05 Sat
Author: ts
Subject: Re: Not you
In reply to: Chris 's message, "Re: Not you" on 17:36:54 02/04/05 Fri

I also read them. I understand Mikes sadness, as if I remember right, he made some 5 or 6 replys , may be the only othe r soul there. May be this kids wants to be alone there with a mirror ro praise himself.it happens to some kids when they think "they got saved", as if hitting a jackpot!
>Remember how UBF members here complained about
>censoring on this board (which does only happen very
>rarely and only if posters violate our written code of
>conduct in the header)? How they cried that we were
>one-sided and they were not allowed to speak? So far
>no posting of Jim has been censored, but Jim censored
>every remark of Mike that challenged any of his
>thoughts.
>
>This is a typical patter. So far, every critical
>statement on any UBF maintained web board or guest
>book was immediately deleted, or the forum was closed
>or password protected.
>
>By the way, I also read the comments of Mike. They
>were approriate and true, though probably too much at
>a single blow for Jim. Anyway, a humble reaction of
>Jim would have been to go through all these comments
>and carefully respond to everything, since Mike's
>comments were all legitimate, helpful and
>constructive. Not responding to any challenging
>questions is a basic hallmark of UBF, and Jim has
>already adopted this pattern quite well.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]