The challenge -- RSQUBF discussion forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:50:06 10/11/04 Mon
Author: Mike K.
Subject: The challenge
In reply to: Nick T. 's message, "Brian ignores meaningful challenges to his posts" on 11:32:59 10/11/04 Mon

Aside for all the personal things, yes, I'd like to see Brian summing up the doctrine of UBF -without omissions- and submit them to examination by an independent Christian board to check them against the Bible in a Berean fashion.

There are two speed bumps, though:
First, the statements about the UBF doctrine need to be true. There's so many people out there who say "this" and mean "that".

Second, the statements need to be complete. They need to include everything. You can only check that which is revealed to you. Like Chris said, even in 10 years of UBF, you still don't know all that they expect from you. Those things are also part of UBF's doctrine. Such, they need to be included.

And then, let the Truth speak for itself.

In Christ,
Mike K.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Brian ignores meaningful challenges to his posts -- former, 11:59:01 10/11/04 Mon