many faslehoods by Cornerstone, Kang -- RSQUBF discussion forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:04:24 07/15/04 Thu
Author: Roving Reporter News Network
Subject: many faslehoods by Cornerstone, Kang
In reply to: ex-UBFSoul 's message, "Re: Anne Kang's article" on 21:19:24 07/14/04 Wed

Thanks for your comment, ubfSoul. We are glad that you went the extra mile to obtain a copy of the article. However, do not place confidence in phony reporting services like Cornerstone. You can see more of Mr. Trott here at

http://www.cornerstonemag.com/jt/

Yes, Trott is the guy with the all the piercings on his face. And if you read his articles you can see that he is fascinated with Satan and demons and is not bashful about saying so.

You may also want to know a little more about Kang personally. Back in the day at UBF, Kang was treated as a superstar for a short time. Even people like Ban Toh would go around writing about Kang and her article in his reports, but no UBFer would ever dare to show anyone a copy of the Cornerstone article. No copy of this article was ever circulated at UBF, because even a UBFer would have a hard time to deny how slanted the article is. After awhile Kang was no longer held up as a superstar. She is presently a nobody in Chicago UBF.

Also, we are sure that Kang's former shepherdess is very manipulative and abusive. Kang herself proved to be a master manipulator by trying to lure a former recruit (Sandra Brower) back to UBF. Sandra and her husband Bill wanted to leave the UBF together in 1999. Sandra was being severely, verbally abused by Doctor Helen Rarick on a daily basis. Sandra could not take it any more, and asked Bill if they could leave. Bill, a very decent and kind man, felt he should go and say 'Bye' to Jim Rarick, his recruiting shepherd, who Bill believed was his friend.

But when Bill went to say 'Bye, he set off a dangerous reaction from the Chicago UBF leaders, who are sadistic and ungodly, and tried to stop the Browers from leaving. (They never reproached Doctor Helen Rarick for her abusive behavior. Docotr Rarick is a no-sheep shepherdess for many years due to her abusive behavior) Chicago UBF leaders went as far as to try to get Bill to divorce Sandra, though they already had two little kids. Jim Rarick in Chicago went as far as to tell Bill that if he would divorce Sandra, they would get him 'a better wife.' The Browers barely escaped UBF before the UBF could totally destroy their family.

This innocent family, the near victim of UBF arranged divorce, left to live their life in peace and quiet. After a year or so of recovering from the UBF experience for this inoocent family, Annie Kang decided to try to recruit them back to UBF as her sheep. Kang deceived Sandra's mother into giving her Sandra's new phone number. Kang pretended to be Sandra's old friend, and met her several times, alone. Then Kang turned their 'friendly meetings' into a pseudo UBF one to one Bible study! Kang also gave the contact information to Jim Rarick, who contacted Bill, pretending to be his good friend. Bill rejected Rarick's effort completely. Still, Sandra could not shake off Kang so easily. A friend suggested that Sandra ask Kang to explain the deprogramming and the Cornerstone article. At the next meeting, Sandra brought up these issues to Kang. Kang refused to provide any explanations at all. And then Kang immediatley stopped all contact.

Another bad sign that this Cornerstone article is false is it tries to portray the American exit counselors as deprogrammers and even kidnappers. If you read the article carefully, you will see it was Kang's own Korean family members who orchestrated the whole event. Her family decieved her and accosted to her to the remote farmhouse. Kang's family who held her there involuntarily. Her grandfather was the brains of the whole operation. Somehow Mr. Kang was able to use government resources to find out alot of scandolous background information about Ee Chang Woo, aka Samuel Lee, but the grandfather would not share this with the Americans. But Kang and Cornerstone try to shift the blame to Americans who were simply asked to provide her with the information about UBF and Samuel Lee's massive deceptions. Maybe Kang's family used deception because Annie is so deceptive?

After Kang left the abduction, she obtained restraining orders basically against her whole family. When Kang rejected the family effort to get her out of the UBF, the granfather went back to Korea devastated.

Also, in the article, Kang lied by saying that there is no such thing as arranged marriage in ubf. Why did she not just come out and say that all ubf marriages are arranged, but that she has the right to particicpate in arranged marriage? Why is yet another UBF member lying to the whole world about their Moon-like marriage process?

The article as a whole is totally slanted. Mr. Trott is not a disinterested person writing from an objective viewpoint. Annie Kang is not a truthful person who describes events accurately. If anything, the article preserves for posterity the UBF heritage of arranged marriage, destruction of families, and the most sophisticated forms of lying and deception.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: many faslehoods by Cornerstone, Kang -- Jim St. L., 01:05:18 07/16/04 Fri
- Re: many faslehoods by Cornerstone, Kang -- Chris, 01:54:51 07/16/04 Fri
- Re: many falsehoods by Cornerstone, Kang -- Joe, 09:39:20 07/16/04 Fri
- Re: many faslehoods by Cornerstone, Kang -- Nick T., 11:59:10 07/16/04 Fri