Re: Money Should Be Handled in the Light -- RSQUBF discussion forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:30:35 09/10/04 Fri
Author: Nonny Moose
Subject: Re: Money Should Be Handled in the Light
In reply to: UBF Member 's message, "Re: Money Should Be Handled in the Light" on 09:49:12 09/10/04 Fri

>Yes, a full and open accounting would prove my point.
>An accounting firm has already done this in Chicago
>and will do it again.

A full and open accounting would necessarily include the original UBF "book" or ledger in which people like Maria Ahn, Jacob Lee and Daniel Yang allegedly recorded Samuel Lee's use of offering money over the decades. An accounting firm's report from 2002 is not going to cut it, is it?

>However, if such information was
>to be posted here, for example, wouldn't it just be
>used to slander UBF all the more?

Just tell us how much Lee and Barry have stored up in the UBF "Central" account over the decades. Is it so hard just to tell the truth?

>It's been shown over
>and over that this forum is anti-UBF...

I think it's been stated up front that this forum is anti-UBF. Did anyone say that this forum would be neutral about UBF?

>I will say it again: It will be proven that UBF is not
>a money-making, abherrant cult.

A little late for that, don't you think? A group like the NAE has already made up its mind about UBF and so have a host of others.

Wasn't Mr. Yang in Chicago in the process of preparing a UBF application for ECFA membership? How's that going? Oh, yeah. I forgot. NAE.

>>UBF Member, if what you say is true then a full and
>>open accounting of ALL UBF expenses and incomes will
>>certainly support your point, no?
>>
>>PLEASE ENCOURAGE UBF LEADERS TO DO ALL ACCOUNTING IN
>>THE LIGHT!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

UBF members have a right to know -- Joe, 19:00:58 09/11/04 Sat