Date Posted:13:10:56 02/22/05 Tue Author: Brother in Christ Subject: Re: Observations In reply to:
Nick T.
's message, "Re: Observations" on 10:41:57 02/22/05 Tue
Hi everyone.
All I can say is. Wow! Columbus sure did not waste anytime in getting in trouble. Basically it is the same complaint we always heard. And basically the same UBF response.
Also I can say that this incident was never mentioned in public circles. I also never caught any inclination of it being mentioned in private circles. Sorry all my sources never heard of it. Either did I until now. All I know about it is what I read here and the video. I will keep my eyes open and "subtly" try to find out any other things besides what was mentioned in the news video.
So I guess it is up to the listener to interpret what is going on.
God Bless everyone
Brother in Christ
>Well, you can't win them all. I have been known to be
>wrong from time to time.
>
>The ubf handled it in a very complicated way, it
>seems. Why did they have to get the Chicago ubf cult
>involved? They could have sent Hank out there to
>look handsome for the camera? Or they could have sent
>out their number one student recruit to face the
>camera. For example, when ubf in Winnipeg was being
>publicized, they sent out some no-name Canadian kid to
>accuse the detractors of being racists and God-haters.
> Why did the ubf respond in such a wimpy way?
>
>Have the ubf leaders become a bunch of wimps? Or are
>they talking meekly to outsiders, but then talking
>trash back at the ubf catacombs in the basement of the
>Chicago ubf building?
>
>Can ubf insders comment on the Columbus TV news show?
>Brother in Christ, do you have any insights? Roving
>Reproter, can you add anything here?
