Re: Observations -- RSQUBF discussion forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:10:56 02/22/05 Tue
Author: Brother in Christ
Subject: Re: Observations
In reply to: Nick T. 's message, "Re: Observations" on 10:41:57 02/22/05 Tue

Hi everyone.

All I can say is. Wow! Columbus sure did not waste anytime in getting in trouble. Basically it is the same complaint we always heard. And basically the same UBF response.

Also I can say that this incident was never mentioned in public circles. I also never caught any inclination of it being mentioned in private circles. Sorry all my sources never heard of it. Either did I until now. All I know about it is what I read here and the video. I will keep my eyes open and "subtly" try to find out any other things besides what was mentioned in the news video.

So I guess it is up to the listener to interpret what is going on.

God Bless everyone
Brother in Christ

>Well, you can't win them all. I have been known to be
>wrong from time to time.
>
>The ubf handled it in a very complicated way, it
>seems. Why did they have to get the Chicago ubf cult
>involved? They could have sent Hank out there to
>look handsome for the camera? Or they could have sent
>out their number one student recruit to face the
>camera. For example, when ubf in Winnipeg was being
>publicized, they sent out some no-name Canadian kid to
>accuse the detractors of being racists and God-haters.
> Why did the ubf respond in such a wimpy way?
>
>Have the ubf leaders become a bunch of wimps? Or are
>they talking meekly to outsiders, but then talking
>trash back at the ubf catacombs in the basement of the
>Chicago ubf building?
>
>Can ubf insders comment on the Columbus TV news show?
>Brother in Christ, do you have any insights? Roving
>Reproter, can you add anything here?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Observations -- Tony Lang, 00:30:12 02/24/05 Thu

Re: Observations -- Nick T., 10:17:21 02/24/05 Thu