Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9], 10 ]

Subject: McCain is unelectable. This assures us that we will have Hillary or Obama in the White Horse. Author: Seller of Sooth [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: Thu, February 07, 2008 12:42:35 In reply to: Reuters 's message, "Romney drops out of presidential campaign" on Thu, February 07, 2008 11:08:22 [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Re: Funny. The polls I've been seeing say McCain beats both Hillary and Barack by 3-5% points. Teller Thu, February 07, 2008 12:51:57 Dear Lord...I hope the polls are wrong Teller. Heaven help this country . (NT) -- Peggy, Thu, February 07, 2008 1:47:53 Re: Folks, this election is over. It's time for both left and right to get behind Barack Obama. If Hillary is out of the picture, -- Goodbye, Mitt! You were a perfect gentleman and a class act all the way, Thu, February 07, 2008 1:54:35 It is not popular vote that decides an election. It is electrical votes. If it were not for eletrical votes Gore and not Bush would be President. The only thing that matters are the electrical votes. -- The polls are idiotic, Thu, February 07, 2008 8:42:40 Re: I have never heard of electrical votes. Are you talking about voting machines or the electoral college? (NT) -- Is this a lame attempt to be funny? If so, HA HA!, Thu, February 07, 2008 11:40:28 I thought it was a good play on words too (NT) -- James M, Fri, February 08, 2008 12:45:14 I think "electrical" was done intentionally. Not sure about the statement that McCain's choice of a running mate will be IMPOTENT. That part cracked me up. (NT) -- Ha Ha for a different reason, Fri, February 08, 2008 2:03:32 McCain supports the Latino side of the immigration issue. Plenty of Republicans who used the "amnesty" approach in 2006 LOST!!! (NT) Adios, Republicanos!! Thu, February 07, 2008 2:57:05 There must be many Republicans out there who believe that a 90% chance that man is responsible for global warming is big enough to warrant taking some action. I wonder if this helped McCain, as the only Republican contender to have a plan of action to attempt to alleviate climate change. (NT) -- James M, Fri, February 08, 2008 12:48:22 Re: I doubt it. McCain didn't win big in any state. There might have been -- Most Republicans are smarter than that, Fri, February 08, 2008 7:03:44 So you '"don't believe there's any evidence to support the idea that it is caused by man". The IPCC seem to disagree with you as they said "There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities" in 2001. -- James M, Sat, February 09, 2008 5:57:55 Re: There are just as many legit scientists who say global warming is NOT caused by man. Some years ago -- Get real, James, Sat, February 09, 2008 12:59:22 The above statement is simply not true. -- James M, Sat, February 09, 2008 6:22:53 Re: And we're supposed to believe you, James? Not hardly! I think -- You have no scientific evidence, Sat, February 09, 2008 11:27:13 And who do yuou think is behind this global warming 'scam'? This fellow? -- James M, Sat, February 09, 2008 11:46:50