An interesting question to contemplate -- RSQUBF Discussion Boards 2001 highlights

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:59:57 01/09/02 Wed
Author: RC
Subject: An interesting question to contemplate
In reply to: rsqarchive 's message, "January 2001" on 10:32:30 01/09/02 Wed

Author: RC
Subject: An interesting question to contemplate

First, I thank God for this website, where people in UBF can share freely their thoughts and experiences. In the controlled environments of UBF meetings and conferences this is very difficult to do since usually real conversation about real issues is squelched. So, praise Jesus for the freedom we have in him. I had been praying for months that a way to share openly might come.

My question is this: Even without addressing the alleged payoffs, the abortions, the assaults, the manipulation....so forth, there is still the question of all these senior leaders getting together to challenge Sam. What kind of church is it that raises up so many misguided, rebellious, and slanderous leaders and places them in key positions of leadership and tolerates them for so long? IF, and I say a BIG IF because I don't believe they are slanderous or rebellious, they are such terrible people, then how could Sam put them in these positions and keep them there for so long? Even on these grounds alone, UBF has to step
back and take a look at what they are doing, because it does not make any sense.

First, there were the original UBF founders who challenged him in 1976, who remembers them? Then there was James Kim, Peter Chang, Augustine Park, and now it is a whole slew that I cannot even name, like Caleb Chung, Jacob Chung, Jimmy Rhee, Mark Hong, John Kim, Matthew Byun....the list goes on and on....These people are leaders with a capital "L." Yet, Sam says they are rebels, slanderers and liars....Sam should be dismissed if indeed he did place such people in positions of leadership.

Also, for you defenders of the UBF faith, contemplate this: you will probably be the next generation of rebels and slanderers....that seems to be the way it always works.

Just thought I would share an interesting way of looking at things.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Analysis of Samuel Lee's Report -- reformubf.org, 11:02:19 01/09/02 Wed