VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:57:37 02/28/06 Tue
Author: rose
Subject: That’s what I thought. I guess question really is, wouldn’t it be considered a breach of a verbal contract? I mean with all the former press releases saying it was a done deal wouldn’t that be grounds for it to be considered a verbal contract between the PRCA & New Mexico or with the amount of money that would be changing hands would there be no grounds for a verbal contract? Anybody know about business law, I was lousy at that myself.
In reply to: Varmit 's message, "rose... I think it was a done deal by word of mouth, but according to the article, nothing has been signed yet. So much for a man's word." on 10:28:35 02/27/06 Mon


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.