Re: Questions for the Creditors' Meeting -- For members of Universal Vacation Club who like things organised.

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:34:51 02/04/02 Mon
Author: Zzz
Subject: Re: Questions for the Creditors' Meeting
In reply to: Mr Concerned 's message, "Re: Questions for the Creditors' Meeting" on 11:47:11 02/04/02 Mon

Goddard is finished in Timeshare. He posses little threat to anyone now. The whole industry knows he is full of hot air and is only associated with failure. He has no respect; therefore, he could not raise the cash needed to start any kind of venture on his own. Parker on the other hand is a danger. That�s not just in the timeshare industry but anything he turns his hand to.

>>I agree, being with RMI will be better for the
>members but anything is better than UVC, but its wrong
>for members of UVC to have to pay more money for the
>gross incompetence of Parker/s & Goddard.
>>
>>Although I do not know if there is any truth in it, I
>hear Goddard is working for RMI as sales manager. Do
>you know anything about this?
>
>What is worrying is that they all (Parkers x2, Goddard
>et al) remain in a position to start / take on
>other companies as directors and repeat their previous
>activities with a similar outcome to their 'customers'.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]