VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]
Subject: 包二奶入罪無需捉姦在床


Author:
Copy Cat
 		[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 01:15:08 02/10/02 Sun
 Please be careful !

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

廣州中級人民法院最近判決一宗包二奶個案，指不需證明兩者性關係，但存在婚外同居係，都足以入罪。

法院以「認定二奶毋須舉證性關係」為由，判定涉嫌包二奶的被告黃某「存在婚外同居關係」，並判處被告必須支付謝姓妻子一萬元人民幣的精神損失賠償費。據廣州大洋網報道，該判決實際上澄清了「配偶者與他人同居」是否必須舉證其有性行為的難點，為法庭判決其他同類案件掃清了障礙。

報道指出，因認為丈夫與婚前情人繼續同居，謝姓妻子去年將丈夫黃某告上法庭，在要求離婚的同時，還索賠精神損害五萬元和生活補助費三萬元。

黃某對婚前曾經有女友譚某並育有小孩供認不諱，但他聲稱與謝某結婚後，他與譚某沒有甚麼聯繫，自己與她沒有發生性關係，否認婚後繼續包二奶。由此，認定「有配偶者與他人同居」是否必須證明其有性行為，成為本案爭議的焦點。

廣州中院的二審判決認為，從黃某的「悔過書」和日記的內容來看，可以確認黃某婚後仍與譚某來往和同居，是導致夫妻感情破裂的過錯方。而且，作為無過錯方的謝某上訴要求精神損害賠償，有事實和法律依據，法院予以支援。於是，法院判令丈夫必須賠償前妻謝某精神撫慰金一萬元。
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.