VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:11:10 06/17/00 Sat
Author: Peter
Subject: Re: 'SA' Tour Pros
In reply to: Don 's message, "Re: 'SA' Tour Pros" on 20:58:03 06/17/00 Sat

> If you view the NG comparisons of impact position of
> the hands in the CG and SA they are the same. A
> conventional golfer having the same hands position at
> impact doesn't make them a "Single Axis Golfer".

I am aware of the NG comparisons. The comparison show the impact positions to be the same. Photos and videos that I've seen show they are close but not the same. For the majority of CG tour pros I have been able to see in appropriate detail, the right fore arm remains above the shaft line (though parallel) at impact.

I was not referring to impact in my post but to setup. A number of pros are, as I said, close to SA allignment (right forearm close to in line with shaft). At least as close as the person on the cover of the new NG magazine seems to be:-)

Also as I pointed out these tour pros have significant body rotation that is the antithesis of NG, IMA and HSS.

Perhaps you are responding to the title of my note vs the content. I put SA in '' for a reason. The reason being that SA allignment is not the only marker for most of the systems I have tried.

I would hesitate to make the generalization you seem to imply by "Single Axis Golfer". I have no knowledge of LPG and SPM. I also don't know what other 'systems' might be out there. I do know that the tenets of NG/IMA vs. HSS are sufficiently different that generalizations are difficult.

Peter

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.