Who may have been involved in a cover-up of evidence? -- JFK Project

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

Subject: Who may have been involved in a cover-up of evidence?

Author:
Harry Altman

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:22:13 02/06/02 Wed

I found some interesting evidence, but can't find a question it fits under. This is from an article called "Heritage of Stone" from High Times magazine Sept. 1991 by Steven Hager.

Although Time, Inc. could have made a small fortune distributing this film around the world, they instead secured the rights from Zapruder for $225,000, then held a few private screenings before locking the film in a vault. It was shown to one newsman, Dan Rather, who then described it on national television. Rather asserted that Kennedy's head went "forward with considerable force" after the fatal head shot (a statement that would have supported a hit from behind, from the direction of the School Book Depository). Several months later, Rather was promoted to White House Correspondent by CBS. As if to buttress this fabrication, the FBI reversed the order of the frames when printing them in the Warren Report. When researchers later drew this reversal to the FBI's attention, Hoover attributed the switch to a "printing error."

Interesting...

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
To clarify: (URL of article)	Harry Altman	11:30:55 02/06/02 Wed