Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

Subject: Re: Was the Warren Commission a valid investigation? Author: David Wu [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 11:39:01 02/27/02 Wed In reply to: Mr Torres 's message, "Was the Warren Commission a valid investigation?" on 11:05:21 02/06/02 Wed I believe that the Warren Commission was not thorough enough, and its information about the JFK assasination case was not completely proved. The Warren Commission's investigation seemed vague. Not many details were confermed. Becasue the Warren Commssion's facts were not really conclusive, it has given me the impresion that these facts are not very acurate, and the investigation was not thorough enough. =========================================== The Shot That Missed (from http://www.jfk-assassination.de/WCR/wcr3.html#p19) From the initial findings that (a) one shot passed through the President's neck and then most probably passed through the Governor's body, (b) a subsequent shot penetrated the President's head, (c) no other shot struck any part of the automobile, and (d) three shots were fired, it follows that one shot probably missed the car and its occupants. The evidence is inconclusive as to whether it was the first, second, or third shot which missed. =========================================== We are certain that the first shot missed the president, for it ricocheted off the road and hit James Teague in the cheek. This proves that the Warren Commission's finding proved to be inconclusive. The government also deployed another investigation to investigate the assasination of JFK. The second group investigating this case was the HSCA (House Select Committee on Assasinations) Because there was a second federal group sent to investigate, this has made me believe that the Warren Commission's investigation was invalid and inconclusive. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date YES Oren Levi 12:01:27 02/27/02 Wed By defiintion, that's invalid Harry Altman 12:13:21 02/27/02 Wed