VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]4 ]
Subject: Re: Not Deserving of an NIT Bid


Author:
professorjackson
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 14:38:04 03/18/03 Tue
In reply to: Titan Julian 's message, "Not Deserving of an NIT Bid" on 14:00:12 03/18/03 Tue

There are 105 teams in post-season play. The only way to tell if the Titans deserved a bid or not is to compare the Titans with teams in the NIT, as done below. Looks like they got screwed a little bit, but not nearly as bad as in the Butler game. All water under the bridge now...

Why does this damned site run so slowly?

Who has the better chance at the upset: UWM or Butler?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: Not Deserving of an NIT BidBlatant Boy05:28:30 03/19/03 Wed


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.