Re: PROOF THE QUR'AN WAS NOT ALTERED BY SATANIC CLERICS -- Islam

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:45:29 04/23/05 Sat
Author: Munakh: Servant of the Most High and One True God
Subject:

Re: PROOF THE QUR'AN WAS NOT ALTERED BY SATANIC CLERICS
In reply to: David R.W. Wadsworth 's message, "PROOF THE QUR'AN WAS ALTERED BY SATANIC CLERICS" on 20:43:12 04/16/04 Fri

David,

This verse of the Quran is not about Christians. It is a verse reminding Muslims to stay away from those who divide their religion (Islam)and break up into sects and that God will decide their affair in the end (day of judgement).

Munakh
Servant of the Most HIGH and ONE an ONLY TRUE GOD , The God of Monotheism not part of the lie called trinity.

>CHRISTIAN SECTS PER THE QUR'AN
>
>
>
>
>YUSUFALI:
>006.159 As for those who divide their religion and
>break up into sects, thou hast no part in them in the
>least: their affair is with Allah: He will in the end
>tell them the truth of all that they did.
>
>QUESTION: IS THE ARABIC WORD "SECTS" & "SCHISMATICS"
>THE SAME? IT IS A LIE OF SATAN TO TRANSLATE "SECTS" AS
>"SCHISMATICS" OR "SCHISMATICS" AS "SECTS." LIES ARE OF
>SATAN, NOT OF GOD!
>
>PICKTHAL:
>006.159 Lo! As for those who sunder their religion and
>become schismatics (sic), no concern at all hast thou
>with them. Their case will go to Allah, Who then will
>tell them what they used to do.
>
>QUESTION: IS THE ARABIC WORD "SECTS" & "SCHISMATICS"
>THE SAME? IT IS A LIE OF SATAN TO TRANSLATE "SECTS" AS
>"SCHISMATICS" OR "SCHISMATICS" AS "SECTS." LIES ARE OF
>SATAN, NOT OF GOD!
>
>SHAKIR:
>006.159 Surely they who divided their religion into
>parts and became sects, you have no concern with them;
>their affair is only with Allah, then He will inform
>them of what they did.
>
>QUESTION: IS THE ARABIC WORD "SECTS" & "SCHISMATICS"
>THE SAME? IT IS A LIE OF SATAN TO TRANSLATE "SECTS" AS
>"SCHISMATICS" OR "SCHISMATICS" AS "SECTS." LIES ARE OF
>SATAN, NOT OF GOD!
>
>NJ DAWOOD
>6:158 Have nothing to do with those who have split up
>their religion into sects. God will call them to
>account and declare to them what they have done.
>
>QUESTION: IS THE ARABIC WORD "SECTS" & "SCHISMATICS"
>THE SAME? IT IS A LIE OF SATAN TO TRANSLATE "SECTS" AS
>"SCHISMATICS" OR "SCHISMATICS" AS "SECTS." LIES ARE OF
>SATAN, NOT OF GOD!
>
>
>
>
>.....................................................
>Commentary:
>
>At the time Muhammad lived, 570 - 632 A.D., and
>supposedly received this, 610 - 632 A.D., there was
>only the Roman Catholic Church. In 1050 A.D., due to a
>rift in doctrine between the Bishop of Greece and the
>Pontiff of Rome, the Roman Pope excommunicated the
>Greek Church and there was two. Next, in Germany,
>Martin Luther, 1483 - 1546 broke away from the Roman
>Catholics. Martin Luther, 1483 - 1546 broke away from
>the Roman Catholic Church after Pope Leo IX of Rome
>excommunicated the entire Greek Church .
>
>On the other hand, there were sects of Islam almost
>from the beginning as Ali in 654 A.D. claimed to be
>Muhammad's successor creating the Shi�tes
>
>PROOF OF ALTERATIONS: Muhammad, an illiterate, taught
>his people the revelations, which he claims Allah
>revealed to him between 610 and 632 A.D. This
>contradicts Muslim�s tenants that �God wrote the
>Qur��n.� Muhammad wrote nothing. He was illiterate. He
>hired pagan professional remembrancers to remember his
>scathing teachings word for word then between 644 and
>656 those remembrancers repeated Muhammad�s teachings
>back to scribes. At the time Muhammad lived, the
>Catholic Church and the Greek Orthodox was one church
>and it wasn't until 1054 that the Roman Catholic Pope
>Leo IX excommunicated the Greek Church, which became
>known as the Greek Orthodox. At the time Muhammad
>taught �Allah�s revelations� -- the Qur��n, there were
>no sects and wasn't any until after 1054 A.D.
>
>On the other hand, there were two sects of Islam
>almost from the beginning as Ali in 654 A.D. claimed
>to be Muhammad's successor creating the Shi�tes. There
>are now 10 sects of Islam each claiming to be true.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>SECTS/CLANS/DIFFERENT PARTIES/FACTIONS
>
>
>
>
>YUSUFALI:
>011.017 Can they be (like) those who accept a Clear
>(Sign) from their Lord, and whom a witness from
>Himself doth teach, as did the Book of Moses before
>it,- a guide and a mercy? They believe therein; but
>those of the Sects that reject it,- the Fire will be
>their promised meeting-place. Be not then in doubt
>thereon: for it is the truth from thy Lord: yet many
>among men do not believe!
>
>QUESTION: IS THE ARABIC WORD "FACTION" OR "SECTS" THE
>SAME? IT IS A LIE OF SATAN TO TRANSLATE "FACTION" AS
>"SECTS" OR "SECTS" AS "FACTION." LIES ARE OF SATAN,
>NOT OF GOD!
>
>PICKTHAL:
>011.017 Is he (to be counted equal with them) who
>relieth (sic) on a clear proof from his Lord, and a
>witness from Him reciteth (sic) it, and before it was
>the Book of Moses, an example and a mercy? Such
>believe therein, and whoso disbelieveth (sic) therein
>of the clans, the Fire is his appointed place. So be
>not thou in doubt concerning it. Lo! it is the Truth
>from thy Lord; but most of mankind believe not.
>
>QUESTION: IS THE ARABIC WORD "FACTION" OR "SECTS" THE
>SAME? IT IS A LIE OF SATAN TO TRANSLATE "FACTION" AS
>"SECTS" OR "SECTS" AS "FACTION." LIES ARE OF SATAN,
>NOT OF GOD!
>
>SHAKIR:
>011.017 Is he then who has with him clear proof from
>his Lord, and a witness from Him recites it and before
>it (is) the Book of Musa, a guide and a mercy? These
>believe in it; and whoever of the (different) parties
>disbelieves in it, surely it is the truth from your
>Lord, but most men do not believe.
>

>PROOF OF ALTERATIONS: Muhammad, an illiterate, taught
>his people the revelations, which he claims Allah
>revealed to him between 610 and 632 A.D. This
>contradicts Muslim�s tenants that �God wrote the
>Qur��n.� Muhammad wrote nothing. He was illiterate. He
>hired pagan professional remembrancers to remember his
>scathing teachings word for word then between 644 and
>656 those remembrancers repeated Muhammad�s teachings
>back to scribes. At the time Muhammad lived, the
>Catholic Church and the Greek Orthodox was one church
>and it wasn't until 1054 that the Roman Catholic Pope
>Leo IX excommunicated the Greek Church, which became
>known as the Greek Orthodox. At the time Muhammad
>taught �Allah�s revelations� -- the Qur��n, there were
>no sects and wasn't any until after 1054 A.D.
>
>On the other hand, there were two sects of Islam
>almost from the beginning as Ali in 654 A.D. claimed
>to be Muhammad's successor creating the Shi�tes. There
>are now 10 sects of Islam each claiming to be true.
>
>
>
>David R.W. Wadsworth
>Servant of the Most High and One True God
>
>DRWWadsworth@greencafe.com
>
>http://www.themillenialdispensation.com

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: PROOF THE QUR'AN WAS ALTERED BY SATANIC CLERICS -- Lamisa (angry), 09:00:56 08/14/06 Mon