| Subject: Re: Quick |
Author:
seriously
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 08:25:27 02/24/02 Sun
In reply to:
seraphad
's message, "Quick" on 08:22:25 02/24/02 Sun
I would want to setup a charting applet somewhere just for the fun of it. yeah, I am a black suit, so what
>I really need to get this up and running asap. Dont
>want to waste too much time on the website design etc.
>Need to get people to start trading weird stuff so
>there are hits on my website, then transfer to my own
>domain. This sucks...somehow I relish pen and paper -
>much easier and faster. Wouldmt make a good fashion
>magazine editor anyway...if I was in charge, will be
>more like a clumsily cobbled early edition Playboy
>esque style. Hey the programmer that could design the
>easiest webpage editor for people with the least HTML,
>dynamic HTML, Flash, Javascript effects as though with
>pen and paper then a million bucks to him I say. As
>for programming, well applets and servlets are easily
>inserted into the code and all well and dandy. Adobe
>Photoshoppers is another area of contention... I guess
>everyone is a digital artist nowdays. Must design
>simple logo and then several gratitious effects. I
>hate popups and thus there can be no popups...where to
>place adverts...banners will do but no garish or
>overly bright colors, subtle colors will fir in
>nicely......
>
>The hallmark of any magazine is a good cartoon strip,
>call me an 80s kid but how can you run a magazine
>without a witty satire and not crude sarcasm...they
>dont make 'em like they used to. luckily I am going to
>run a hobbyist site and most likely wont lose
>focus....How do you define fun anyway these days?
>Certaintly not an absence of work I hope but rather a
>stimulation of the senses; if not the mind in which
>casual probing may reveal an inqusitive nature bent on
>mischief. No, engagement is a better word to use. You
>want to talk and instantaneously there is a reply.
>
>interactivity of websites with users reaching the
>level of games. perhaps...an interesting notion,
>provided that the basic functions are not compromised.
>ah well I suppose that entertainment is subjective at
>best, rambly at worst. the new millenium up till now
>heralds a loss of innonence beyond comprehension, up
>to a point where there are no new experiences to be
>had, no new avenues to be explored, no bated
>anticipation of a more cheery tommorrow.
>
>Bloody hell, I think for myself I am going to turn the
>wheel back and have a text adventure applet for my
>website so that people are forced to think and
>elocute.
>
>End of self-indulgence nonsense but I will incorporate
>the text adventure somehow...
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 