VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:42:46 02/25/02 Mon
Author: Helpful player
Subject: Maybe it should be a certain age, like under one year.
In reply to: Fellow player 's message, "I agree, its confusing" on 12:24:12 02/23/02 Sat

Maybe if the cub is under one year, then it can't be sneaked. But if they are over a year, then they are fair game.

Just my opinion. That way, the royalty of every section won't be constantly sneaked.i,maliciousintentsneaklarkfromroaringforest

If the cubs are allowed to be sneaked, maybe a provision could be added that the parents have unlimited visitation? Any thoughts?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.