VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]
Subject: OK - well then your statement is hogwash - with no basis whatesover. Because if we go by the MW standard - since Lena Ma (2009) placed higher than all of them except 2003.


Author:
Zinger
 		[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 12:39:04 05/22/11 Sun
In reply to: JF 's message, "I clearly stated that this was my opinion from the very beginning. Yes, it was maybe the judges fault, but still, they got accepted as candidates by the organization. Also, I didn't imply that all the girls placed, I just said that I found them to be all gorgeous from 2003-2007, and then not up to international standards (again, thats my personal opinion)." on 17:51:23 05/21/11 Sat
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.