Georgia's picture quality was awful this year, and South Carolina and other states I've paid for in the past (including Arkansas, Oklahoma and Nebraska) have been worth the price for the quality of the stream and the pricing. SC has had some problems with freezing up in the past but I hope they will not have those issues this year. -- SOUTH CAROLINA MAO - PLEASE NO BANNERS

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

Subject: Georgia's picture quality was awful this year, and South Carolina and other states I've paid for in the past (including Arkansas, Oklahoma and Nebraska) have been worth the price for the quality of the stream and the pricing. SC has had some problems with freezing up in the past but I hope they will not have those issues this year.

Author:
No name
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: Saturday, June 16, 11:36:27pm
In reply to: 's message, "Most other states you have to pay actually. Georgia is free because it is attached to an local news channel. It is worth paying. It benefits the organization. It's actually cheaper than other states that charge." on Thursday, June 14, 10:35:22pm

>> I

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.