Re: What would you do? -- Middle East Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:41:43 09/12/02 Thu
Author: Sukia
Subject: Re: What would you do?
In reply to: I would not do what you doing. 's message, "Re: What would you do?" on 10:09:05 09/11/02 Wed

>RE. I would pay more attention to what the
>palestinians leaders are saying today, and pay less
>attention to what jews and the americans leaders'
>interpretation to what they think palestinians goal
>and intentions are. And yes, I would not pay any
>attention to the jews and americans leaders' policies
>which start with "if" that they have for the moslems
>countries. And I would also ask you to tell the moslem
>world in general and middle east in particular, the
>way to defend them from the only country in middle
>east that has nuclear capabilty, that is Israel.
>Because, let me assure you that the we do not feel
>comfortable with the fact that israel has nuclear
>capabilty, and we expect that USA + the club called
>UNO after desroying irakks so called nuclear
>facilities, do the same with Israel.

And what is with the USA?
Words are sound and smoke. I would look, what they
do, not what they say. And disarmament for all! But
that must decide each individual people. Perhaps the
Americans should force their dominant ones to the
disarmament. But this doesn't go, because these
dominant ones in America have made themselves too
many enemies. Or not?

Some have the weapons, in order to subject others.
Others have their weapons, in order to defend itself.
Somehow ill. Isnt it?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]