VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:17:42 10/27/00 Fri
Author: 馮志弘
Subject: Re: 靈慾之爭在文學上素來爭論不休...
In reply to: 智敏 's message, "靈慾之爭在文學上素來爭論不休..." on 09:17:44 10/27/00 Fri

  語詞翻譯問題:我搞不清楚你的「本我」是弗洛伊德的Id還是
ego,抱歉,請說明。

  你的看法很有見地,使人驚喜。

  我的回應是:

1.非常值得留意的是莎菲的「性別」、「身體」、「精神」三者之
間的關係。「身體」一定程度是被決定的,姑勿論是先天(賦與)或
後天(建立身體的形式與意義)。

2.也許仍用弗洛伊德的話:如果莎菲希望透過一種「靈」來建立她
的「自我理想」(ego ideal),那麼,凌吉士就未嘗不是莎菲從這個
理想出發,想像出來的「他我理想」。在莎菲心中,凌吉士原來也是
靈欲合一的象徵。只是接著下來「認識」帶來的改變,大家都知道
了。

  也許莎菲並不如羅蘭.巴特用「身體」一詞來取代「自我」這樣
來得理所當然,只是其中「慾」的發現是相當明顯的,歷來學者把
《菲》文視為「女性的獨立宣言」,很大程度正因如此。

  你的見解對我有很大啟發,謝謝。:)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.