VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 05:40:30 10/24/00 Tue
Author: 馮志弘
Subject: 兼談蔡嘉敏、叢麗明留言中的「消極」。
In reply to: 蔡嘉敏《第三組》 's message, "回應戴望舒《秋蠅》" on 01:26:37 10/24/00 Tue

一.我認為,「消極/積極」作為作品的評價標準,它(們)的道
  德意味、政治意味、那怕是經濟意味,似乎都要比「文學意味」
  大得多;

二.比較強硬的說法是:我的作品就是這樣消極的了,so what?

三.比較溫柔的說法是:「消極」似乎僅僅飾演文學上的鑰匙,除了
  鑰匙,我們關注的還有門、窗、房子裡的人、桌椅……還有,為
  甚麼這條鑰匙是這個形狀的?

  這是我個人的看法,請大家繼續討論。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.