Re: Bach/McCoy? -- Sleaze Roxx

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:18:03 01/10/06 Tue
Author: Skid
Subject: Re: Bach/McCoy?
In reply to: Antzy 's message, "Bach/McCoy?" on 00:37:45 01/10/06 Tue

This is what Andy McCoy said about the recordings on his website www.andymccoy.com

I heard that Sebastian Bach's record company thought they weren't "heavy metal" enough which is ridiculous. We recorded some great "hard rock" with a lot more guts than most "heavy metal" you'll ever hear. I suppose the music was more Hanoi - Aerosmith (70's) type of stuff. Btw, this is the same company that said Skid Row's Slave to the Grind was TOO heavy metal.

I spoke to Bass about it when I met him last summer. He told me he has the tapes, so we spoke of maybe putting the stuff out ourseves. Only time will tell.

XX LUV,
Andy

>Hi,
>
>Does anyone here know about Bach/McCoy-record? Former
>Skid Row vocalist Sebastian Bach and Hanoi Rocks lead
>guitarist Andy McCoy did together some material in the
>mid of 90�s, but it was never officially released for
>some reason of other. I think it wasn�t so heavy style
>music as the record company probably expected at that
>time because of Bach and his background...that�s only
>something what I�ve heard about it. The idea behind
>this project was a very interesting one at least,
>something very similar like Coverdale/Page a little
>bit earlier.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]