and we agree -- Notes from Zarahemla Political Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:50:28 01/30/07 Tue
Author: Cricket
Subject: and we agree
In reply to: Jay 's message, "Okay, I hear where you're coming from . . ." on 12:48:08 01/30/07 Tue

Well, that is just the point. We are being lulled by one party when both are being manipulated by Satan. Weren't we warned that the Constitution would be have to be destroyed because it had become corrupted by those who
used it to further the agenda of the adversary? Does it really matter which party is in power?

Not any more. Where the military has entered in the picture the last ten years is that Clinton weeded members out and exploded the welfare rolls plus expanded law enforcement to the states with federal funding for police.
The final purging of those who hated Clinton and were otherwise not PC happened in the last five years.

Now think about this: Crime stats. Do they go down or up in a different administration and why? I have a theory that crime 'increases' (fake the crisis) to justify egregious legislation to address it, then gets rigorously enforced to show that they are 'doing something.'

It goes down in another because while the threat really isn't there domestically, the international threat comes to the fore.

Sort of a bait and switch. Rethugs have the world and the Democrats do the domestic.

What do you think?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

What do I think? -- Jay, 17:18:54 01/30/07 Tue
- One more observation -- Cricket, 17:54:25 01/30/07 Tue
  - That's an interesting thought. -- Jay, 18:21:59 01/30/07 Tue