Re: 石頭問題有問題嗎？ -- 人生無題

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Mon April 07, 2003 00:41:42
Author: Gadinism Corrected Version
Subject: Re: 石頭問題有問題嗎？
In reply to: Gadinism 's message, "Re: 石頭問題有問題嗎？" on Mon April 07, 2003 00:10:37

First, i think this is a question that has already been discussed for a certain period of time, many people do have their own expressions and ideas.
I only want to ask what is logic and what is theory?
The meaning of 'logic' and 'theory' is expressed by human only. That means it may be wrong or can be changed.
I think all of you know that in the past, people do think that the Earth is in the centre of the universe, or even before the Great Discovery, people do believe that at the edge of the sea there is a cliff that goes straight into hell. People at that time do believe this, but when someone has a different idea, people think that they are madand crazy because according to their 'logic' and 'theory', they can only think of something like that. But when time passes by, haven't we proved that the world is round, the Earth is only a tiny planet in the Milky Galaxy.
The question of the stone and the word 'almighty' is only based on our knowledge and sense. Please don't forget what we are discussing is beyond our knowledge, we can only believe it, or trust it.
If so, you may say that it is not scientific. Until now, science has not proved the existence of God. But on the other hand, there are many scientists who do believe in God because when they know more about this world, they can hardly believe how great the universe is. It is actually a miracle, they know that there must a creator, it can't have happened accidentally.
If you really want to prove the existence of God, you should give up. It implies even more that the question of the stone, we can't prove resurrection either. But what we believe is what the Bible tells us, and for hundred of years no one has successfully challenged the bible's teaching.
Every religion is based on faith, if you realy want it 'logically' or 'theoretically', that's fine, we may then stop this discussion NOW.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

不，不 -- 01:01, Mon April 07, 2003 01:06:06
- Re: 不，不 -- Gadinism, Mon April 07, 2003 02:07:47
  - ^^ -- 15:57, Mon April 07, 2003 16:04:03