VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Tue April 08, 2003 05:28:13
Author: 05:17
Subject: Re: 提出的同時,假設應已存在。
In reply to: 小朱屎屎 's message, "Re: 提出的同時,假設應已存在。" on Tue April 08, 2003 02:58:20

A【若神是全能,衪能造一塊衪舉不起的石頭,但如果衪造不到的話,衪就不是全能。】
B【若神是全能,衪能造一石頭,同時亦能舉高這石頭,但衪只可滿其中一事,所以不是全能。】
C【若神不是全能,衪造不到一塊衪舉不起的石頭,所以衪不能全能。】
D【若神不是全能,衪在造一石頭和舉高這石頭中,只可滿其中一事,所以神不是全能。】

單憑這四項已足以證明石頭問題不需要甚麼「假設」。
【所以提出這問題的同時,「神是全能」的假設已同時出現了。】
照你對「假設」的用法,「神不是全能」的假設難題也出現了。
這兩個「假設」都出現,代表了甚麼呢?代表這問題中肯。在推論之前我們接受「神是全能」這可能性,也接受「神並非全能」這可能性。

推論之後,得出的結論是「神並非全能」,有人不接受,就說問題「言之無物」。推論一定要得出一個以上的結果嗎?這是甚麼定律?未曾聞之。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.