VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wed April 16, 2003 12:52:05
Author: joe
Subject: Re: 不太明白
In reply to: 丞相 's message, "不太明白" on Sat April 05, 2003 03:26:18

推論本身已假設了的, 當然結論就會和假設一樣了,
因為推論本身已假設了神不是全能的, 所以才會有機會有神不能做出的東西, 因為基本上, 神是全能, 就不會有神不能做出的東西, 只有在假設了神不是全能, 那麼推論才有可能包含神不能做出的東西存在的可能性. 這樣, 從推論裡包含了神不能做出的東西, 可以知道它的假設是在神不是全能的大前題底下的, 既然神已不是我們聖經裡所定義全能的神, 所以這個推論如果用在討論聖經的問題上, 就根本犯了一詞多義, 字義含糊的謬誤.
因為基本上這個推論裡所用的"神", 意義上是和聖經裡的"神"有出入的, 既是這樣, 這推論的邏輯就犯了毛病了.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.