Uxbridge played really, really poorly -- Central Mass Football Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 05:47:51 12/02/02 Mon
Author: f-ball
Subject: Uxbridge played really, really poorly

I went to the Northbridge-Uxbridge game on Thursday. I had read Coach Parcells talk about how good his team was. I wonder who he was talking about. They certainly didnt show up Thursday. The Northbridge offense didn't play that great either but it might have been becuase everytime they made a cut (especially #33) they fell down. They also had a lot of illegal procedure penalties. That Brown kid had as many yards rushing (63) as Uxbridge did of total offense (65). On defense, #78 batted down about 5 passes and #83 was throwing kids to the ground. I really believe that if that game was played on something other than frozen tundra, the score would have been 49-0. Uxbrisge at no time stopped Northbridge. Northbridge only stopped themselves. I'm sorry for the Uxbridge players who lost. I think NHS has won for 6 straight years. Don't the playa, hate the game.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[>

Re: Uxbridge played really, really poorly -- fan, 09:02:23 12/02/02 Mon

I dont know why everyone thought that the Northbridge/Uxbridge game was going to be a tight one. Northbridge has dominated all year. Look at the past 30 years versus Uxbridge, Northbridge probably won 25 times while Uxbridge won only 5. This could possibly be the best Northbridge team in a long time. Very good defense with a ton of speed on offense. They should win their 7th superbowl saturday

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Uxbridge played really, really poorly -- high school football reporter, 19:11:34 12/02/02 Mon

I thought the Northbridge/Uxbridge final would be less than 10 points.With some of the talented players Uxbridge has, I thought this year would be their year to upset Northbridge. But Uxbridge didn't play a team all year with the type of defense Northridge has.Just because Uxbridge lost to Northbridge, it doesn't mean they are a bad team.Their two loses were to Super Bowl teams with a combined 21-1 record.I think Coach Parcells and his players, deserve a lot of praise for having an outstanding season.Good Luck Northbridge in the Super Bowl against Wahconah.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> Re: Uxbridge played really, really poorly -- High School football reporter, 19:17:28 12/02/02 Mon

I thought the Northbridge/Uxbridge final would be less than 10 points.With some of the talented players Uxbridge has, I thought this year would be their year to upset Northbridge. But Uxbridge didn't play a team all year with the type of defense Northridge has.Just because Uxbridge lost to Northbridge, it doesn't mean they are a bad team.Their two loses were to Super Bowl teams with a combined 21-1 record.I think Coach Parcells and his players, deserve a lot of praise for having an outstanding season.Good Luck Northbridge in the Super Bowl against Wahconah.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]