Re: kharn didn't take credit for those, you nitwit -- the no diamondgypsy allowed forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:39:15 06/07/04 Mon
Author: ygsm
Author Host/IP: 151.204.157.248
Subject: Re: kharn didn't take credit for those, you nitwit
In reply to: eom 's message, "kharn didn't take credit for those, you nitwit" on 02:55:52 06/07/04 Mon

>>THIS IS STUPID, on the other hand, was an obnoxious
>>asshole.
>>I banned zem because when I checked the ip of the 5th
>>or 10th post I came across, it had zem's name on it.
>>
>>I later saw Kharn or somebody taking credit for some
>>of those posts, but zem was already unbanned by that
>>point, so I saw no point in banning anyone else.
>
>
>don't you ever read that board sober?
>
>ps
>
>what kharn said was that he reg'd the name 'this is
>stupid', thus preventing further use of that name.
>although, what point he thought there was to that I
>have no idea.
>hash is legal there, I think.

No, I don't read the board sober very much. duh.

Zem claimed he stopped posting at 1:00pm, Kharn said he reg'd the id, I drew a bad inference from it and didn't do anything anyway.

yawn.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Re: kharn didn't take credit for those, you nitwit -- Kharn, 16:14:17 06/08/04 Tue (213.84.47.237)

>what kharn said was that he reg'd the name 'this is
>stupid', thus preventing further use of that name.
>although, what point he thought there was to that I
>have no idea.

The funny thing is that actually works, because registered names show the same thing as is shown to banned people, which is, uhm, "uh, uh, naughty"

So whoever is posting could also assume he's banned, rather than that some cocktard reg'd his name.

Meh, depends on the stupidity of the spammer

>hash is legal there, I think.

That might also have been of influence on the above, yes.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]