MESSAGE BOARD POLICE -- We wouldn't lie to you.

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:12:28 03/28/01 Wed
Author: Caleb
Subject: MESSAGE BOARD POLICE
In reply to: kirsten 's message, "uhhh...... the eptiomy of consistancy... how's that?" on 02:01:39 03/28/01 Wed

re:

"that" will not do at all. as long as the M.B.P. is in control of this board, we will refrain from using words such as "eptiomy" and "consistancy", as well as an assortment of other non-english language words in the place of suitable "correct" words such as "epitome" and "consistency".

as a side note, all efforts to arrange the aforementioned acceptable words in an order which would create the greatest semblance of an "idea" or "complete thought" would be greatly appreciated.

that will be all.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Re: MESSAGE BOARD POLICE -- that girl in boston, 01:38:32 03/29/01 Thu

oh, caleeb, you crack me up ever so much. hehehe only you could post something like that and make it so humorous. ;)

>re: >that?>
>
>"that" will not do at all. as long as the M.B.P. is in
>control of this board, we will refrain from using
>words such as "eptiomy" and "consistancy", as well as
>an assortment of other non-english language words in
>the place of suitable "correct" words such as
>"epitome" and "consistency".
>
>as a side note, all efforts to arrange the
>aforementioned acceptable words in an order which
>would create the greatest semblance of an "idea" or
>"complete thought" would be greatly appreciated.
>
>that will be all.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> pointless message -- from chazz, 00:28:43 03/31/01 Sat

i am doin this so that the newer messages are on top. higgins likes to get real old messages and respond to them so they go to the top, what a queer he is.

>oh, caleeb, you crack me up ever so much. hehehe
>only you could post something like that and make it so
>humorous. ;)
>
>>re: >>that?>
>>
>>"that" will not do at all. as long as the M.B.P. is in
>>control of this board, we will refrain from using
>>words such as "eptiomy" and "consistancy", as well as
>>an assortment of other non-english language words in
>>the place of suitable "correct" words such as
>>"epitome" and "consistency".
>>
>>as a side note, all efforts to arrange the
>>aforementioned acceptable words in an order which
>>would create the greatest semblance of an "idea" or
>>"complete thought" would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>that will be all.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]