equal moderation would have meant a shared responsibility -- Jesus Army Watch Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 28/11/09 12:19:48am
Author: Peter Eveleigh
Subject: equal moderation would have meant a shared responsibility
In reply to: Sarah Hughes 's message, "Re: the cutest irony" on 27/11/09 11:25:50pm

>Are you admitting you wanted to control me Pete...
>careful, careful, watch your words... they may catch
>you out on here :) You can't delete and change
>things.. one reason why i chose not to go on JAD.. You
>edit very well, almost like you've had experience with
>the media...

Only someone with a very warped mind would read it that way, Sarah.

I wouldn't dream of changing anything I have said on here, and I hope nobody else does because this posting of yours is an excellent illustration of the way you and the JA operate.

Anyone who has kept up with the JAD business knows that you were to have been a moderator, which would have given you equal control of the site; you would have been at liberty to edit anything I put, and vice versa. The beauty of it was that you would have had the same control as a man. Another good reason for the men in community to put a stop to it, sadly.

And if you had gone through with it you would then have been in a good position to assert that you were an independent woman, which patently is not now the case.

I didn't want to control you. I wanted to share a responsibility with you as an equal.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Stockholm syndrome -- Peter Eveleigh, 28/11/09 12:37:56am
- Re: Stockholm syndrome -- Peter Eveleigh, 28/11/09 12:46:05am
- Re: Stockholm syndrome -- Sarah Hughes, 1/12/09 4:18:55pm

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
> >>Are you admitting you wanted to control me Pete... >>careful, careful, watch your words... they may catch >>you out on here :) You can't delete and change >>things.. one reason why i chose not to go on JAD.. You >>edit very well, almost like you've had experience with >>the media... > >Only someone with a very warped mind would read it >that way, Sarah. > >I wouldn't dream of changing anything I have said on >here, and I hope nobody else does because this posting >of yours is an excellent illustration of the way you >and the JA operate. > >Anyone who has kept up with the JAD business knows >that you were to have been a moderator, which would >have given you equal control of the site; you would >have been at liberty to edit anything I put, and vice >versa. The beauty of it was that you would have had >the same control as a man. Another good reason for the >men in community to put a stop to it, sadly. > >And if you had gone through with it you would then >have been in a good position to assert that you were >an independent woman, which patently is not now the >case. > >I didn't want to control you. I wanted to share a >responsibility with you as an equal.
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.