Re: Question #2 -- The Apostolic Defender Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:50:05 10/01/02 Tue
Author: Pastor Reckart
Subject: Re: Question #2
In reply to: PFP 's message, "Question #2" on 19:15:24 09/29/02 Sun

PFP shows a great lack of Biblical understanding when he denies the sacrifice to be taken away in Daniel 9:27 was the daily one.

He says reference to the sacrifice as "daily" is extra-biblical and man made. I beleive the reason this person is a Preterist is because he/she does not have the revelation in the Word at all, but has instead been brainwashed into a heresy and loves every minute of it. Does the word "sacrifice" in Daniel 9:27 refer to the daily sacrifice? Answer yes:

"Yea, he magnified himself even to the prince of the host, and by him the daily sacrifice was taken away, and the place of his sanctuary was cast down" (Dan 8:11).

"And an host was given him against the daily sacrifice by reason of transgression, and it cast down the truth to the ground; and it practiced, and prospered" (Dan 8:12).

"Then I heard one saint speaking, and another saint said unto that certain saint which spake, How long shall be the vision concerning the daily sacrifice, and the transgression of desolation, to give both the sanctuary and the host to be trodden under foor" (Dan 8:13).

"And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the wicked" (Daniel 9:27).

Note: It is in the midst of the week he confirms the covenant that the sacrifice is to cease. Either the 70th week began at the baptism of Jesus or it did not begin until 63AD (to allow seven years for the 70th week to end in 70AD). So take your pick Preterist. You cannot have it both ways!

"And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily sacrifice, and they shall place the abomination that maketh desoloate" (Dan 11:31).

"And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, adn the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days" (Dan 12:11).

"Who needeth not daily, as those high priest, to offer up sacrifice, forst for his own sins, and then for the people's: for this he did once, when he offered up himself" (Heb 7:27).

The daily sacrifice was the continued focus God placed upon the temople. There is no hint the sacrifice to stop was any other. We have a choice, either the sacrifice of Jesus ENDED all animal sacrifices forever at Calvary, or God intended animal sacrifices for salvation for those under the law to continue untill 70AD. It is a fact that if the law continues to 70AD, animal sacrifices must continue to 70AD, both come in one package. And if the law continues with animal sacrifices then the Levitical priesthood continued until 70AD.
A moron may vote for 70AD as the end of the sacrifices (daily included), but those who have faith in the finished work of the Cross would NEVER deny Calvary and the blood that was shed to end all animal sacrifices. It is blasphemy to say the sacrifice of Jesus did not end the daily sacrifice referenced in Daniel 9:27.
Yes, we know the Pharisees continued to offer animal sacrifices and we also know before the temple was destroyed they stopped in the temple. But they did not stop in 70AD, Jews have been making animal sacrifices non-stop since 70AD. Animal sacrifices were made all the way to Bar Kochaba in the second century. They just did not do them in the temple in Jerusalem. They did do them in Jerusalem after 70AD.
There is no text that says all animal sacrifices must be in the Jerusalem temple. There were many sacrifices not made in the temple in ancient times. Jews stil offer up animal sacrifices. They DID NOT cease to be offered in 70AD. They may have ceased in the temple, but before 70AD. They actually ceased or were hindered before 70AD according to Josephus.

The true Biblical interpretation is that the sacrifices for sins and atonement, as well as the daily sacrifices were ended at Calvary. God ceased to accept them in any manner.

Paul said: "For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sancrified" (Heb 10:14).

Calvary is the time of the middle of the prophetic 70th week and this is the focus of the ending of the sacrifice in Daniel 9:27. If the ending of the sacrifice is made to be in 70AD, then someone needs to explain how the 70th week can stretch from the banks of the Jordan and the baptism of Jesus to the destruction of the temple. Maybe one of you Preterist can explain this. Get the 70th week from Calvary to 70AD.

The dual claim that one function of animal sacrifices ended at Calvary and the Law continued until 70AD and animal sacrifces ened at that time is a false doctrine.

The Preterist heresy is a false doctrine. It is not the doctrine of Jesus or his Apostles.

The correct answer to question #2 is Daniel 9:27 was filfilled at Calvary and has no connection to 70AD whatsoever!

Pastor Reckart

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Question #2 -- Nathan DuBois, 09:18:42 10/08/02 Tue