Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct:
Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ] |
| Subject: Why no DNA testing for Royals? | |
Author: Curnoack | [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] Date Posted: 16:06:53 11/20/04 Sat What have the royals got to hide? If they are descended from the first born of the royal line, they should prove it... Why does Prince Harry look nothing like Prince Charles*, but plenty like Diana's lover, Mr Hewitt? A Hewitt on the throne of the United Commonwealth? Down with the monarchy, up the Republican Commonwealth!!! * He also looks nothing like the woman they tried to pay to do his A-Level art for him!!! -> The truth about the usurpers of English royalty and public funds... http://www.throneout.com/ [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| [> Subject: It is unfortunate when one's defintion of a good family only extends to similar genetics | |
|
Author: Roberdin [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 17:00:36 11/20/04 Sat [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |
| [> [> Subject: What's the point in primogeniture without the primo-genitals? | |
|
Author: Curnoack [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 17:16:23 11/20/04 Sat [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |
| [> [> [> Subject: Isn't it funny how they will claim that the royal family is too exclusive, then object that it is not exclusive enough? | |
|
Author: Ian (Australia) [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 20:58:42 11/20/04 Sat [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |