It is unfortunate when one's defintion of a good family only extends to similar genetics -- FCS Discussion Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Subject: It is unfortunate when one's defintion of a good family only extends to similar genetics
Author: Roberdin	[ Next Thread \| Previous Thread \| Next Message \| Previous Message ] Date Posted: 17:00:36 11/20/04 Sat In reply to: Curnoack 's message, "Why no DNA testing for Royals?" on 16:06:53 11/20/04 Sat [ Next Thread \| Previous Thread \| Next Message \| Previous Message ]

[> [> Subject: What's the point in primogeniture without the primo-genitals?
Author: Curnoack [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 17:16:23 11/20/04 Sat [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> Subject: Isn't it funny how they will claim that the royal family is too exclusive, then object that it is not exclusive enough?
Author: Ian (Australia) [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 20:58:42 11/20/04 Sat [ Post a Reply to This Message ]