VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]45 ]
Subject: Now I get it. If you're a liberal you believe a graduate assistant and the


Author:
c
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 15:42:50 05/14/07 Mon
In reply to: DE 's message, "Pigs..." on 04:13:24 05/14/07 Mon

Humane Society know more about how to maximize piglet production than pig breeders. Makes perfect sense -- to liberals.










>Like I care what the hell the pig stood in just before
>they killed it. All I want is her dead suculent flesh
>to season to perfection and then roast in my ove
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Study Renews Debate Over Sows in Crates
>
>
>
>
>AMES, Iowa -- A new study is raising questions about
>the effectiveness of small, metal crates for pregnant
>pigs that animal welfare groups say are cruel and
>inhumane.
>
>Researchers from Iowa State University found that
>allowing pregnant pigs to move freely in group housing
>structures called hoop barns could be less costly and
>just as productive as the narrow, individual crates.
>
>"What we found was that there appears to be no real
>difference in pig performance between the two," said
>Peter Lammers, an ISU graduate research assistant who
>conducted data analysis for the 2 1/2-year study.
>
>There has been a backlash against placing pregnant
>sows in the gestation crates. Some food processors and
>fast food chains have pledged not to purchase meat
>from producers who use them, and some chefs said they
>would only use crate-free pork. The European Union has
>decided to phase out the crates by 2013, while voters
>in Florida and Arizona have approved ballot
>initiatives to ban them over the next few years.
>
>"Highly intelligent animals, curious animals are
>crammed in a 2-foot-by-7-foot cage that doesn't even
>allow them to turn around," said Wayne Pacelle, CEO of
>the Humane Society of the United States.
>
>He said the sows remain in the cages for most of their
>four-month pregnancies, amounting to about three years
>by the time they're eventually slaughtered.
>
>The pork industry has defended the use of the
>gestation crates, which allow producers to house as
>many pigs as possible in one building. Industry
>representatives argue that pregnant sows can be
>aggressive toward one another in groups, and that the
>stalls allow for equal feeding and care of each sow.
>Individual management of the animals has been thought
>to aid their productivity.
>
>Dave Warner, a spokesman for the Washington,
>D.C.-based National Pork Producers Council, which
>lobbies for the nation's 67,000 pork producers, said
>the majority of the group's members use gestation
>stalls, though he noted that both the crates and group
>housing have their advantages and disadvantages.
>
>The ISU study was conducted at a research farm in
>southwest Iowa. It compared sows housed in stalls in
>mechanically ventilated confinement buildings to those
>in naturally ventilated hoop barns with straw bedding.
>
>Researchers who tracked 957 litters from 353 sows
>found that sows in the hoop barns gave birth to more
>live pigs per litter than those confined in gestation
>stalls.
>
>They also found that group housing may produce pigs at
>a lower cost -- as much as 11 percent less per weaned
>pig -- than the gestation stalls, Lammers said.
>
>He said sows in the hoop barns may have done better
>because of the bedding and ability to huddle, which
>allows them more control over their temperature.
>Individual feeding stalls in the hoop barns continued
>to allow for feed management.
>
>Even though soiled straw must be removed, the
>researchers said group housing may not require more
>labor per animal than gestation stalls.
>
>"In the United States, using a bedded system for
>gestating sows in hoop barns is relatively
>unfamiliar," Mark Honeyman, animal science professor
>and coordinator of ISU's Research Farms said in a
>statement. "With increased experience, management will
>evolve and production may be enhanced."
>
>Lammers said the purpose of the study "wasn't to say
>one view was right, or one view was wrong."
>
>"The purpose of this report was to examine what are
>the impacts of the types of gestation sow housing," he
>said.
>
>A related study, based on a survey of general
>contractors and equipment and materials suppliers,
>said the estimated construction cost per gestating sow
>in hoop barns was $552, compared with $815 for the
>crates.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.