VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5] ]
Subject: Anothrer Democrat who never saw an opportunity


Author:
Curmudgeon
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 10:00:06 11/11/06 Sat
In reply to: DE 's message, "Still winning, AK shoots down oil tax..." on 04:36:20 11/10/06 Fri

to raise taxes he didn't like. Apparently he doesn't believe in our free markets. Hope he lost Tuesday.






>Alaskan Voters Say No to Oil Reserves Tax Initiative
>
>November 09, 2006 — By Matt Volz, Associated Press
>ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Alaska voters shot down a proposal
>to tax oil companies $1 billion a year until they
>build a pipeline to take the largest reserve of
>natural gas in the United States from the North Slope
>to Midwestern markets, election results showed on
>Wednesday.
>
>The tax would have been levied against the
>leaseholders of the North Slope's 35 trillion cubic
>feet of natural gas reserves until the gas starts
>flowing to market.
>
>Opponents of the measure say the tax would have killed
>the $25 billion pipeline project. Its proponents say
>it is the only way to force oil companies to build the
>pipeline.
>
>Would-be pipeline owners and gas reserves leaseholders
>Exxon Mobil Corp., BP PLC and ConocoPhillips say the
>tax would add another 50 percent to the cost of the
>project. Others in the oil industry believe it would
>discourage further exploration.
>
>If another company or a consortium built the pipeline,
>it would pay none of the tax, so there is no increase
>in the pipeline's cost, supporters say.
>
>With more than 98 percent of Alaskan precincts
>reporting, 66 percent of voters came out against the
>proposal.
>
>Democratic Rep. Eric Croft of Anchorage, the main
>sponsor of the initiative, interpreted the results as
>Alaskans wanting to give the oil companies operating
>in the state a chance to do good by committing to a
>gas pipeline.
>
>"Everybody wants a gas line, but they want to see if
>we can do it without taking out a big hammer," Croft
>said. "That's fair enough, I trust the people. We'll
>give that a try. But if these people continue to hold
>the gas hostage, we may see it again."
>
>The initiative would set a 3-cent tax on every 1,000
>cubic feet of proven natural gas reserves in Prudhoe
>Bay and Point Thomson that the leaseholders -- North
>Slope oil and gas producers -- don't extract and ship
>to market.
>
>When a pipeline is built, the tax would be repealed
>and a portion of the money collected from the oil
>companies would be refunded through credits.
>
>Source: Associated Press

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.