| Subject: Re: Actually..... |
Author:
Duncan7
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 22:24:40 11/22/06 Wed
In reply to:
sci guy
's message, "Actually....." on 07:50:50 11/22/06 Wed
Don't worry about it sci, it's not the stupidest thing you've ever posted. Maybe if the internet bubble hadn't burst we would of had something to fall back on.
>the destruction of the WTC didn't really have that big
>an effect.
>
>The point loss from the peak to Sept7th 01 was 2117,
>while the loss in the 2 weeks following 9/11 was only
>1370. There ws a further loss up to july 02 of
>another 533 points, bringing the total post 9/11 loss
>to 1903 points. HOwever, not all the losses after
>Sept 21st are the fault of 9/11 jitters. A lot of
>them were because of continued lack of fiscal care by
>the administration: continued broken promises, out of
>control costs, tax cuts, as well as a bumbling US
>pResident who was clearly unable to deal with crisis.
>
>
>href="http://www.mdleasing.com/djia.htm">http://www.mdl
>easing.com/djia.htm
>
>BTW, do you know the reason for the loss of 1425
>points from July 2002 to Oct 2002?
>
>
>>Apparently your ignoeing the fact that the world trade
>>center was erased from existance. Plug that into your
>>long term trend. You expected an 18 month recovery
>>from that? Glad I wasn't educated in canada.
>>
>>>the economy should have grown much more. Long term
>>>trends show that the economy recovers from downturns
>>>such as occurred when Bush was elected much faster
>>>than it has. Your vaunted DJIA should have
>re-reached
>>>the peak within 18 months, not 6 years.
>>>
>>>Ooops!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Bush tax cuts, our economy has grown by an amount
>>>>equal to the entire economy of China, demonstrating
>>>>once again the wisdom of what most of us learned in
>>>>Taxes 101: Reducing tax rates increases economic
>>>>activity (and increases tax revenues -- an added
>>>>benefit).
>>>>
>>>>Go Bush!!! Go tax cuts!!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>China just needs to let a couple billion of their
>>>>>people die. Considering that there are only just
>>>over
>>>>>one billion, that means that either you don't know
>>>>>what yo uare talking about (yet again) or you want
>>to
>>>>>eliminate teh Chinese from the planet. Either way,
>>>>>your ignorance seems to know no bounds.
>>>>>
>>>>>>that Mainland China is not exactly forthcommming
>>>with
>>>>>>AIDS numbers. For a long time they did not even
>>>>>>officially admit that they had AIDS in their
>>>>country.
>>>>>>We just do not truly know the extent that AIDS has
>>>>>>infected population of Mainland China. And the
>>>>>>numbers that I was reading a few years back are
>>>>>>extremely large and they were growing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>This presents two sub problems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>First off IF there is a major AIDS problem then
>>>>>>Mainland China just might do absolutely nothing at
>>>>all
>>>>>>and in the process eliminate a bunch of hungry
>>>mouths
>>>>>>to feed. IF IF IF mainland China were to let a
>>>>couple
>>>>>>of billion people just die a natural death via
>AIDS
>>>>>>then the government would be much better off
>>>>>>financially (fewer mouths to feed, etc)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Second problem being the state of medicine in
>>>>Mainland
>>>>>>China. While probably adequate for general
>medical
>>>>>>problems, the AIDS Epidemic means a major problem
>>>>that
>>>>>>requires a geared up state of the art medical care
>>>>>>system. And I just do not see the state of
>>medicine
>>>>>>in Mainland China being capable of handling the
>>>>>>ultimate massive amount of AIDS victims that will
>>>>come
>>>>>>weither they want to admit the numbers or not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I guess that I just cannot see any outcome on a
>>>>global
>>>>>>scale for the AIDS Pandemic having any other
>>outcome
>>>>>>other than massively huge amounts of death.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 